Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darren Sears's avatar

Preserving a species/genus outside its native habitat or natural associations has always struck me as a completely different kind and purpose of conservation. Asking whether it’s “enough” (e.g. even if those pandans in secondary forest keep thriving) doesn’t seem like a worthwhile question? It’s better than extinction obviously but that bar seems too low to mean much.

No posts

Ready for more?